
A Practical Guide for Ecommerce and DTC Advertisers
For ecommerce and DTC brands running performance campaigns on the web, the stakes are high: you need to drive purchases, improve ROAS, and scale efficiently without relying on user-level tracking or manual targeting. You’ve undoubtedly pushed the limits of Meta and potentially TikTok too but you need to keep finding new channels that can scale - discover and test there early enough and you can unlock efficiencies before your competitors too!
Two platforms often mentioned when discussing scaling mobile ad strategies are Axon by AppLovin and InMobi. Both offer AI-driven optimization, but they’re built on fundamentally different assumptions — and those differences matter when your business runs on web-based conversion signals, not app installs or in-app events.
This guide breaks down how Axon and InMobi compare, what web advertisers should prioritize, and how to use each effectively to scale smarter.
If you’re running campaigns for a .com storefront, a DTC brand, or a multi-product ecommerce site, your needs are clear:
Let’s start by stating that InMobi doesn't support web advertising.

Axon is designed for this exact environment. It’s not a mediation tool. It’s not an app-only solution. It’s a demand-side platform powered by machine learning, built to help web advertisers optimize delivery, bidding, and creative performance using real-time, privacy-safe signals.
Let’s break down how these two platforms differ — not in features specifically, but in how they actually operate for web advertisers.

InMobi emphasizes manual control. It offers tools for audience segmentation, contextual targeting, and creative testing through its Studio platform. This can be useful for app developers with rich first-party data and internal UA teams managing granular campaigns.
Axon, on the other hand, is built for automation. It uses real-time behavioral and contextual signals — collected via the Axon pixel — to model conversion likelihood and adjust delivery dynamically. There’s no need to upload audiences or define targeting rules. Axon learns from live performance and adapts in motion.
For web advertisers, this difference is critical. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and often ineffective in privacy-restricted environments. Axon’s automation frees up bandwidth and improves performance without requiring constant oversight.
InMobi is optimized for app environments. It supports SKAN postbacks and leverages in-app events for attribution and optimization. While it can technically support web campaigns, its infrastructure is not purpose-built for pixel-based tracking.
Axon is designed for app and web. It ingests pixel-based signals — purchases, add-to-cart actions, session depth — and uses them to forecast conversion probability. Attribution is modeled using aggregated data, not user-level identifiers.
Bottom line: If your business runs on website conversions, Axon’s attribution model is more aligned with your data reality.

InMobi Studio allows for manual creative testing and variant management. This gives teams full control but requires ongoing input and analysis.
Axon automates creative rotation. It evaluates engagement and conversion performance in real time, suppresses underperforming assets, and scales top variants — all without manual A/B testing.
For lean teams or brands running multiple SKUs and campaigns, Axon’s creative intelligence system is a force multiplier.
InMobi supports privacy frameworks like ATT and GDPR, but its optimization still leans on app-based identifiers like IDFA and GAID.
Axon is built for a post-IDFA world. It does not use user-level tracking. Instead, it relies on:
This makes Axon a safer, more future-proof choice for advertisers navigating tightening privacy regulations.
Let’s walk through how Axon operates under the hood — and how it translates into real-world performance for ecommerce brands.
The Axon pixel is the foundation. Once installed on your website, it tracks:
These signals are anonymized and aggregated, then fed into Axon’s machine learning engine. The system uses this data to model conversion likelihood and adjust delivery in real time — no cookies, no user IDs, no manual tagging.
Axon supports two primary optimization goals:
Once you select a goal, Axon automatically adjusts bidding and delivery to maximize performance against that metric. There’s no need to manually adjust bids or segment audiences — Axon handles it dynamically.
Axon continuously evaluates creative performance and rotates assets based on real-time engagement signals. That means:
Advertisers should upload a mix of formats — static images, short-form video, interactive overlays — and refresh assets regularly to support Axon’s learning cycles.
Axon calculates the predicted value of each impression using pixel data and contextual signals. It adjusts bids in real time to prioritize users most likely to convert — not just click.
This helps advertisers:
Axon doesn’t just rotate creatives — it understands them. It uses semantic matching and engagement prediction to:
This allows lean teams to scale creative testing without constant manual input.
Axon is built for compliance. It does not use IDFA, GAID, or user-level tracking. Instead, it relies on:
Advertisers are responsible for collecting consent and passing flags correctly. Axon’s infrastructure supports GDPR, CCPA, and ATT compliance.
Place the Axon pixel on your website to track conversion events. Use the Conversions API for server-side reliability. This enables Axon to ingest performance signals and begin modeling user behavior.
Choose either ROAS or CPP as your optimization target. Axon will automatically adjust delivery to maximize performance against that goal.
Provide a mix of formats and styles:
Axon will test and prioritize top performers automatically.
Use Axon’s reporting suite to track:
Export data to Looker Studio, BigQuery, or Sheets using the Reporting API or connectors like Portable.io.
Does Axon support audience segmentation? No. Axon uses aggregated behavioral and contextual signals to optimize delivery. Manual targeting is not supported.
Can I use Axon for retargeting? Axon does not support traditional retargeting. It optimizes toward conversion goals using real-time performance signals.
What attribution method does Axon use for web campaigns? Web campaigns rely on pixel-based tracking and Conversions API. SKAN postbacks are only relevant for mobile apps.
What creative formats work best? Short-form video, static images with clear CTAs, and interactive end cards tend to perform well. Axon rotates creatives based on engagement and conversion performance.
Is Axon compliant with privacy regulations? Yes. Axon uses aggregated, anonymized signals and complies with GDPR, ATT, and other global standards.
Can I run Axon alongside other platforms? Yes. Many advertisers use Axon alongside Meta, Google, and TikTok. Axon’s predictive bidding and creative automation make it a strong complement to manual platforms.
If you’re an ecommerce brand trying to scale efficiently, the right platform is the one that:
Axon by AppLovin is built for that. It’s a demand-side platform designed to help advertisers grow — intelligently, efficiently, and compliantly.
ATT (AppTrackingTransparency) is Apple’s framework that requires apps to explicitly ask users for permission before tracking their activity across other apps and websites. While it’s critical for mobile app campaigns, Axon’s web campaigns don’t rely on ATT because they use pixel-based signals instead of device-level identifiers.
GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) is the European Union’s data privacy law. It mandates transparency, consent, and user control over personal data. Axon supports GDPR compliance by operating on aggregated, anonymized data and requiring advertisers to pass consent flags correctly.
CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act) is California’s version of GDPR. It gives users rights over how their data is collected and used. Axon’s infrastructure is designed to support CCPA through privacy-safe tracking and opt-in consent workflows.
IDFA (Identifier for Advertisers) is a unique device-level identifier used by iOS apps for tracking and attribution. Axon does not use IDFA at all — it relies on contextual and behavioral signals instead, making it suitable for privacy-first environments.
GAID (Google Advertising ID) is Android’s equivalent of IDFA. Like IDFA, it’s used for tracking users across apps. Axon avoids GAID and instead focuses on aggregated pixel data and modeled conversions.
SKAN (StoreKit Ad Network) is Apple’s privacy-preserving attribution framework for iOS app installs. It provides anonymized postbacks with limited conversion data. SKAN is only relevant for mobile app campaigns; Axon’s web campaigns use pixel-based tracking and server-side Conversions API instead.
Conversions API refers to a server-side method for sending conversion events directly to platforms. Axon uses this alongside its pixel to ensure reliable, privacy-compliant tracking for web advertisers — especially when browser-side signals are limited or blocked.